2013 Consumers Report Top 10 Picks – Honda dominates in 3 categories.

Washington — Seven Japanese automakers led by Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. topped Consumer Reports’ annual auto rankings of 26 brands. Fourteenth place was the best that any Detroit automaker fared.

The magazine unveiled its influential 2013 annual auto ratings issue Tuesday in Washington, saying Toyota’s Lexus unit was the top overall brand, with all of its vehicles recommended. It was followed by Subaru and Mazda, which tied for second; and Toyota and Acura, which tied for fourth.

All U.S. brands were in the bottom half of the rankings. Fewer than half were recommended by the magazine, and most were from General Motors Co.’s GMC and Chevrolet brands.

And for the first time since at least 2008, Consumer Reports choose no U.S. vehicles among its top 10 picks. The magazine chose not to pick a top pickup because redesigns of Chrysler’s Dodge Ram — Truck of the Year at the Detroit auto show last month — and GM’s Chevrolet Silverado haven’t been tested.

“The Big Three are in big transition right now,” said Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports. “They are coming out with all of these brand-new models, which are far improved … but when you come out with new models and new powertrains, you end up with reliability woes. And they are struck with some of those old models that were designed years ago that really aren’t up to snuff.”

The highest-ranked U.S. brand was GM’s Cadillac unit, which tied Hyundai for 14th out of 26 brands. Cadillac’s standing came largely on the strength of the CTS. GMC and Chevrolet were in a three-way tie with Volvo for the No. 17 spot; Buick was 21st.

GM spokesman Klaus-Peter Martin said, “While there is more work to do, we believe that we are on a good track as a manufacturer,” he said, noting GM “improved in all of the Consumer Reports reliability and test scores.”

Ford Motor Co.’s Ford brand was ranked No. 23, followed by Lincoln at 24. The Dearborn automaker had just five of 16 models tested that were recommended.

Consumer Reports said Ford’s rankings were dragged down by MyFord Touch and MyLincoln Touch control interfaces that the magazine says are difficult to use. It also criticized some new manual transmissions and EcoBoost engines that didn’t meet performance expectations.

“That’s unfortunate, because many of Ford’s new models ride and handle as well as European luxury cars costing much more. And Ford’s latest hybrids, the Fusion Hybrid and C-Max, are impressive,” Fisher said.

Ford said other surveys show it is making progress. “J.D. Power and other third-party results validate our own internal metrics showing isolated areas for improvement — primarily with MyFord Touch and PowerShift automatic transmissions,” the automaker said.

The Chrysler brand was in the 22nd spot. Its Jeep and Dodge lines were at the bottom of the rankings, at No. 25 and No. 26. Chrysler had three recommended models. The only recommended Dodge is the Durango SUV; the only recommended Jeep is the Grand Cherokee.

“Although we are moving in the right direction, we’ll be the first to acknowledge that we need to improve faster,” said Doug Betts, senior vice president for quality at Chrysler Group. “We’re aggressively upgrading our product lineup.”

The magazine for the first time ranked individual auto brands rather than the overall automaker. Ratings are based on feedback from 1.2 million owners, Consumer Reports testing and other factors.

Top Cars

Consumer Reports’ 2013 top pics by category:

Midsize sedan Honda Accord
Budget Car Hyundai Elantra
Compact Car Subaru Impreza
Green Car Toyota Prius
Luxury Car Audi A6
Minivan Honda Odyssey
Sports sedan BMW 328i
Sports car Scion FR-S
Sports car Subaru BRZ
Small SUV Honda CR-V
Midsize SUV Toyota Highlander

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 × two =

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>